Beyond the biography of jesus of nazareth

THE MAN CHRIST JESUS. Did Swagger of Nazareth exist as top-hole real human being? Outside fence the New Testament, what deference the evidence for his existence? In this article, author Writer Mykytiuk examines the extra-Biblical textual and archaeological evidence associated reach the man who would turning the central figure in Faith. Here Jesus is depicted bring a vibrant sixth-century C.E. claque from the Basilica of Sant’Apollinare Nuovo in Ravenna, Italy.Photo: Sant’Apollinare Nuovo Ravenna, Italy/Bridgeman Images.

After flash decades toiling in the sit on groves of academe, I obtainable an article in BAR titled “Archaeology Confirms 50 Real People in the Bible.”a The enormous interest this article generated was a complete surprise show consideration for me. Nearly 40 websites fall six languages, reflecting a state spectrum of secular and scrupulous orientations, linked to BAR’s supplementary web page.b Some even posted translations.

I thought request following up with a accurate article on people in nobility New Testament, but I anon realized that this would take off so dominated by the methodically of Jesus’ existence that Unrestrained needed to consider this query separately. This is that article:1

Did Jesus of Nazareth, who was called Christ, exist as straight real human being, “the person Christ Jesus” according to 1 Timothy 2:5?

The sources normally thesis fall into three main categories: (1) classical (that is, Greco-Roman), (2) Jewish and (3) Religionist. But when people ask of necessity it is possible to further that Jesus of Nazareth in truth existed, as John P. Meier pointed out decades ago, “The implication is that the Scriptural evidence for Jesus is prejudiced because it is encased coop up a theological text written encourage committed believers.2 What they really desire to know is: Is about extra-Biblical evidence … for Jesus’ existence?”c

Therefore, this article will get better classical and Jewish writings mock exclusively.3

Interested in learning about dignity birth of Jesus? Learn advanced about the history of Xmas and the date of Jesus’ birth in the free eBookThe Culminating Christmas: The Story of Jesus’ Birth in History and Tradition.

Tacitus—or more formally, Caius/Gaius (or Publius) Cornelius Tacitus (55/56–c. 118 C.E.)—was a Roman senator, orator last ethnographer, and arguably the reasonable of Roman historians. His term is based on the Exemplary word tacitus, “silent,” from which amazement get the English word tacit. Interestingly, his compact prose uses muteness and implications in a consummate way. One argument for character authenticity of the quotation erior is that it is predetermined in true Tacitean Latin.4 But pull it off a short introduction.

Roman historian Tacitus.Photo: Bibliotheque nationale, Paris, France Release Giraudon / Bridgeman Images.

Tacitus’s stay fresh major work, titled Annals, written proverb. 116–117 C.E., includes a recapitulation of Nero. In 64 C.E., during a fire in Malady, Nero was suspected of confidentially ordering the burning of nifty part of town where smartness wanted to carry out natty building project, so he proved to shift the blame prank Christians. This was the contingency for Tacitus to mention Christians, whom he despised. This court case what he wrote—the following passage is translated from Latin soak Robert Van Voorst:

TACIT CONFIRMATION. Influential historian Tacitus’s last major work, Annals, mentions a “Christus” who was executed by Pontius Pilate captivated from whom the Christians modified their name. Tacitus’s brief concern corroborates historical details of Jesus’ death from the New Earnest. The pictured volume of Tacitus’s works is from the wiggle of the 17th century. Significance volume’s title page features Plantin Press’s printing mark depicting angels, a compass and the motto Labore et Constantia (“By Labor and Constancy”). Photo: Tacitus, Opera Quae Exstant, trans. antisocial Justus Lipsius (Antwerp, Belgium: One-time officina Plantiniana, apud Joannem Moretum, 1600). Courtesy of the City Rare Books & Manuscripts Veneer. (PRB&M).

828either human effort nor magnanimity emperor’s generosity nor the conciliative of the gods ended rank scandalous belief that the blaze had been ordered [by Nero]. Therefore, to put down high-mindedness rumor, Nero substituted as culprits and punished in the nearly unusual ways those hated letch for their shameful acts … whom the crowd called “Chrestians.” Illustriousness founder of this name, Sovereign [Christus in Latin], had been completed in the reign of Tiberius by the procurator Pontius Pilate … Suppressed for a repulse, the deadly superstition erupted improve not only in Judea, magnanimity origin of this evil, however also in the city [Rome], where all things horrible fairy story shameful from everywhere come total and become popular.5

Tacitus’s terse spreading about “Christus” clearly corroborates picture New Testament on certain ordered details of Jesus’ death. Tacitus presents four pieces of thoroughly knowledge about Jesus: (1) Christus, old by Tacitus to refer disclose Jesus, was one distinctive level by which some referred generate him, even though Tacitus incorrectly took it for a secluded name rather than an cognomen or title; (2) this Christus was comparative with the beginning of honesty movement of Christians, whose fame originated from his; (3) no problem was executed by the Exemplary governor of Judea; and (4) the time of his fatality was during Pontius Pilate’s superintendence of Judea, during the power of Tiberius. (Many New Witness scholars date Jesus’ death put up the shutters c. 29 C.E.; Pilate governed Judea in 26–36 C.E., in detail Tiberius was emperor 14–37 C.E.6)

Tacitus, like classical authors in accepted, does not reveal the source(s) he used. But this be compelled not detract from our buoyancy in Tacitus’s assertions. Scholars usually disagree about what his store were. Tacitus was certainly in the middle of Rome’s best historians—arguably the unexcelled of all—at the top break into his game as a scholar and never given to unsatisfactory writing.

Earlier in his career, considering that Tacitus was Proconsul of Asia,7 he likely supervised trials, questioned construct accused of being Christians roost judged and punished those whom he found guilty, as jurisdiction friend Pliny the Younger confidential done when he too was a provincial governor. Thus Tacitus stood a very good coldness of becoming aware of acquaintance that he characteristically would suppress wanted to verify before acquiring it as true.8

CHRESTIANS OF The almighty. Book XV of Tacitus’s Annals is uninjured in the 11th–12th-century Codex Mediceus II, graceful collection of medieval manuscripts put in the picture housed in the Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana in Florence, Italy, ahead with other manuscripts and books that belonged to the House family. Highlighted above is interpretation Latin text reading “… whom the crowd called ‘Chrestians.’ Decency founder of this name, Master, had been executed in magnanimity reign of Tiberius by magnanimity procurator Pontius Pilate …” Photo: Codex Mediceus 68 II, fol. 38r, the Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Florence, Italy.

The time away strong evidence that speaks at once about Jesus as a actual person comes from Josephus, grand Jewish priest who grew shore up as an aristocrat in first-century Palestine and ended up extant in Rome, supported by blue blood the gentry patronage of three successive emperors. In the early days perceive the first Jewish Revolt conflicting Rome (66–70 C.E.), Josephus was a commander in Galilee on the other hand soon surrendered and became straight prisoner of war. He spread prophesied that his conqueror, illustriousness Roman commander Vespasian, would conform to emperor, and when this really happened, Vespasian freed him. “From then on Josephus lived get in touch with Rome under the protection look after the Flavians and there unagitated his historical and apologetic writings” (Gerd Theissen and Annette Merz).9 He even took the name Flavius, after the family name be advisable for his patron, the emperor Vespasian, and set it before government birth name, becoming, in wash Roman style, Flavius Josephus. Almost Jews viewed him as orderly despicable traitor. It was moisten command of Vespasian’s son Christian that a Roman army sidewalk 70 C.E. destroyed Jerusalem attend to burned the Temple, stealing close-fitting contents as spoils of combat, which are partly portrayed prosperous the imagery of their gloat triumph on the Arch be a devotee of Titus in Rome.10 After Titus succeeded his father as emperor, Historian accepted the son’s imperial agency, as he did of Titus’s brother and successor, Domitian.

Yet atmosphere his own mind, Josephus remained a Jew both in ruler outlook and in his propaganda that extol Judaism. At dignity same time, by aligning woman with Roman emperors who were at that time the pessimum enemies of the Jewish hand out, he chose to ignore Judaic popular opinion.

Josephus stood in neat unique position as a Hebrew who was secure in Romanist imperial patronage and protection, ardent to express pride in potentate Jewish heritage and yet by oneself independent of the Jewish agreement at large. Thus, in levying Romans to Judaism, he mat free to write historical views for Roman consumption that were strongly at variance with rabbinical views.

Jewish historian Josephus is delineate in the ninth-century medieval manuscriptBurgerbibliothek Bern Codex under the Greek inscription “Josippos Historiographer.”Photo: Burgerbibliothek Bern Cod. 50, f.2r.

In his two great works, The Somebody War and Jewish Antiquities, both written thorough Greek for educated people, Historian tried to appeal to aristocrats in the Roman world, delivery Judaism as a religion be introduced to be admired for its ethical and philosophical depth. The Jewish War doesn’t mention Jesus except in callous versions in likely later fandangles by others, but Jewish Antiquities does mention Jesus—twice.

The shorter reproach these two references to Swagger (in Book 20)11 is incidental persist at identifying Jesus’ brother James,12 the ruler of the church in Jerusalem. In the temporary absence closing stages a Roman governor between Festus’s death and governor Albinus’s delivery in 62 C.E., the buzz priest Ananus instigated James’s performance. Josephus described it:

Being therefore that kind of person [i.e., simple heartless Sadducee], Ananus, thinking go wool-gathering he had a favorable chance because Festus had died stall Albinus was still on emperor way, called a meeting [literally, “sanhedrin”] of judges and procumbent into it the brother out-and-out Jesus-who-is-called-Messiah … James by term, and some others. He masquerade the accusation that they abstruse transgressed the law, and take action handed them over to rectify stoned.13

James is otherwise a only noticed, minor figure in Josephus’s lengthy tome. The sole endeavour for referring to James trim all was that his fixate resulted in Ananus losing monarch position as high priest. Saint (Jacob) was a common Human name at this time. Diverse men named James are fathom in Josephus’s works, so Historiographer needed to specify which single he meant. The common vogue of simply giving the father’s name (James, son of Joseph) would not work here, due to James’s father’s name was extremely very common. Therefore Josephus unwavering this James by reference wish his famous brother Jesus. On the other hand James’s brother Jesus (Yehoshua) as well had a very common title. Josephus mentions at least 12 other men named Jesus.14Therefore Historian specified which Jesus he was referring end up by adding the phrase “who is called Messiah,” or, thanks to he was writing in Greek, Christos.15 This phrase was necessary to catalogue clearly first Jesus and, on Jesus, James, the subject give an account of the discussion. This extraneous direction to Jesus would have unchanging no sense if Jesus confidential not been a real person.

Visit the historical Jesus study period in Bible History Daily squalid read more free articles make signs Jesus.

JAMES, BROTHER OF JESUS. In Jewish Antiquities, parts of which muddle included in this mid-17th-century notebook of translations, Josephus refers make available a James, who is alleged as “the brother of Jesus-who-is-called-Messiah.” Josephus’s mention of Jesus pack up specify which James was career executed by the high divine Ananus in 62 C.E. affirms the existence of the factual Jesus. Photo: Josephus, Famovs and Memorable Factory of Josephvs, trans. by Poet Lodge (London: J. L. summon Andrew Hebb, 1640).

Few scholars control ever doubted the authenticity clench this short account. On blue blood the gentry contrary, the huge majority accepts it as genuine.16 The phrase optional to specify which Jesus, translated “who remains called Christ,” signifies either lose concentration he was mentioned earlier sketch the book or that readers knew him well enough secure grasp the reference to him in identifying James. The current is unlikely. First-century Romans as a rule had little or no notion who Christuswas. It is much restore likely that he was diagram earlier in Jewish Antiquities. Also, rank fact that the term “Messiah”/“Christ” is not defined here suggests that an earlier passage in Jewish Antiquitieshas already mentioned something unravel its significance.17 This phrase is likewise appropriate for a Jewish chronicler like Josephus because the tendency to Jesus is a evasive, neutral statement about what dried up people called Jesus and band a confession of faith go off actually asserts that he was phrase—“who is called Christ”—is announcement unlikely to have been go faster by a Christian for digit reasons. First, in the Latest Testament and in the exactly Church Fathers of the important two centuries C.E., Christians customarily refer to James as “the brother of the Lord” respectable “of the Savior” and accurate terms, not “the brother a selection of Jesus,” presumably because the reputation Jesus was very common streak did not necessarily refer accept their Lord. Second, Josephus’s sort inJewish Antiquities of how and during the time that James was executed disagrees put together Christian tradition, likewise implying dinky non-Christian author.18

This short identification precision James by the title renounce some people used in join to specify his brother proceeds credibility as an affirmation admire Jesus’ existence because the going is not about Jesus. Somewhat, his name appears in trim functional phrase that is baptized for by the sense line of attack the passage. It can only suitably useful for the identification quite a lot of James if it is graceful reference to a real informer, namely, “Jesus who is alarmed Christ.”

This clear reference to Deliverer is sometimes overlooked in debates about Josephus’s other, longer slope to Jesus (to be forsaken next). Quite a few humanity are aware of the questions and doubts regarding the someone mention of Jesus, but regularly this other clear, simple allusion and its strength as endeavor for Jesus’ existence does whimper receive due attention.

The longer movement in Josephus’s Jewish Antiquities (Book 18)19 that refers to Jesus is known although theTestimonium Flavianum.

If it has humble value in relation to influence question of Jesus’ existence, deter counts as additional evidence for Jesus’ continuance. The Testimonium Flavianum reads as follows; rectitude parts that are especially in doubt because they sound Christian intrude on in italics:20

Around this time there momentary Jesus, a wise man, if astoundingly one ought to call him a man.21 For he was call who did surprising deeds, come to rest a teacher of such bring into being as accept the truth readily. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Messiah. When Pilate, effect hearing him accused by general public of the highest standing betwixt us, had condemned him drop in be crucified, those who block the first place came check in love him did not commit up their affection for him, for on the third day, misstep appeared to them restored border on life. The prophets of Immortal had prophesied this and prodigious other marvelous things about him. And the tribe of Christians, and above called after him, have attain to this day not on top form out.22

All surviving manuscripts of the Testimonium Flavianum that are in Greek, on the topic of the original, contain the much version of this passage, occur to no significant differences.

The main methodically is: Did Flavius Josephus draw up this entire report about Nobleman and his followers, or plain-spoken a forger or forgers alternate it or possibly insert greatness whole report?23 There are three habits to answer this question:24

Regarding Alternative 1, today almost negation scholar accepts the authenticity expose the entire standard GreekTestimonium Flavianum. In contrast to the distinctly Christian statement “He was authority Messiah” in theTestimonium, Josephus away “writes as a passionate endorse of Judaism,” says Josephus authority Steve Mason. “Everywhere Josephus praises the excellent constitution of class Jews, codified by Moses, last declares its peerless, comprehensive stop … Josephus rejoices over converts to Judaism. In all that, there is not the least hint of any belief eliminate Jesus”25 as seems to be reflect in the Testimonium.

The bold affirmation comment Jesus as Messiah reads whilst a resounding Christian confession dump echoes St. Peter himself!26 It cannot be Josephus. Alternative 1 psychotherapy clearly out.

Regarding Alternative 2—the whole Testimonium Flavianum is a forgery—this is development unlikely. What is said, spell the expressions in Greek turn this way are used to say attach importance to, despite a few words dump don’t seem characteristic of Historian, generally fit much better tighten Josephus’s writings than with Christly writings.27 It is hypothetically possible digress a forger could have perspicacious to imitate Josephus’s style ferry that a reviser adjusted picture passage to that style, on the contrary such a deep level custom attention, based on an finalize, detailed reading of Josephus’s output and such a meticulous approving of his vocabulary and have round, goes far beyond what excellent forger or a reviser would need to do.

Even more elemental, the short passage (treated above) that mentions Jesus in groom to identify James appears outward show a later section of blue blood the gentry book (Book 20) and implies that Jesus was mentioned previously.

The BAS DVD Uncovering Early Christianity offers quadruplet exclusive full-length lectures by Bart Ehrman on topics ranging unearth forgeries and counter-forgeries in character New Testament to how accept when Jesus became divine. Learn build on >>

THE TESTIMONY OF JOSEPHUS. That 15th-century manuscript, now in blue blood the gentry Bibliothèque Nationale de France, contains the portion of Josephus’sTestimonium Flavianum that refers to Jesus (highlighted magnify blue). The first sentence magnetize the manuscript, highlighted in verdant, reads, from the Greek, “Around this time there lived Boss around, a wise man, if undoubtedly one ought to call him a man.” The majority female scholars believe this passage get the picture the Testimonium is based assess the original writings of General but contains later additions, budding made by Christian scribes. Photo: Codex Parisinus gr. 2075, 45v. Courtesy Bibliothèque Nationale de France.

The best-informed among representation Romans understood Christusto be nothing author than a man’s personal term, on the level of Publius and Marcus. First-century Romans as a rule had no idea that business someone “Christus” was an high reference, implying belief that recognized was the chosen one, God’s anointed. The Testimonium, in Book 18, appropriately found in the stint that deals with Pilate’s halt in its tracks as governor of Judea,28 is clearly one of Josephus’s characteristic digressions, this time occasioned by allude to of Pilate. It provides qualifications for Josephus’s only other impossible to get into mention of Jesus (in Jotter 20), and it connects grandeur name Jesus with his Christly followers. The short reference tolerate Jesus in the later publication depends on the longer predispose in the earlier (Book 18). If the longer one research paper not genuine, this passage lacks its essential background. Alternative 2 should be rejected.

Alternative 3—that the Testimonium Flavianum is based on an creative report by Josephus29 that has antediluvian modified by others, probably Christlike scribes, seems most likely. Aft extracting what appear to snigger Christian additions, the remaining words appears to be pure Historiographer. As a Romanized Jew, Pharisee would not have presented these beliefs as his own. Interestingly, in three openly Christian, non-Greek versions of the Testimonium Flavianumanalyzed impervious to Steve Mason, variations indicate swing were made by others too Josephus.30 The Latin version says The almighty “was believed to be the Messiah.” Ethics Syriac version is best translated, “He was thought to reasonably the Messiah.” And the Semitic version with open coyness suggests, “He was perhaps the 1 concerning whom the prophets possess recounted wonders.” Alternative 3 has the support of the crushing majority of scholars.

We can inform quite a bit about Act big from Tacitus and Josephus, figure famous historians who were keen Christian. Almost all the adjacent statements about Jesus, which clutter asserted in the New Testimony, are corroborated or confirmed gross the relevant passages in Tacitus and Josephus. These independent factual sources—one a non-Christian Roman coupled with the other Jewish—confirm what incredulity are told in the Gospels:31

Some of Jesus’ masses did not abandon their oneoff loyalty to him even care for his crucifixion but submitted adopt his teaching. They believed meander Jesus later appeared to them alive in accordance with prophecies, most likely those found scuttle the Hebrew Bible. A well-attested link between Jesus and Christians is that Christ, as expert term used to identify Son, became the basis of greatness term used to identify dominion followers: Christians. The Christian boost began in Judea, according hitch Tacitus. Josephus observes that pretense continued during the first hundred. Tacitus deplores the fact prowl during the second century authorize had spread as far since Rome.

As far as we identify, no ancient person ever scout's honour argued that Jesus did beg for exist.33 Referring to the first various centuries C.E., even a pedagogue as cautious and thorough in that Robert Van Voorst freely observes, “… 828o pagans and Jews who opposed Christianity denied Jesus’ historicity or even questioned it.”34

Nondenial of Jesus’ existence is peculiarly notable in rabbinic writings emulate those first several centuries C.E.: “… [I]f anyone in ethics ancient world had a lucid to dislike the Christian godliness, it was the rabbis. Add up argue successfully that Jesus on no account existed but was a cult of early Christians would suppress been the most effective tilt against Christianity … [Yet] conclude Jewish sources treated Jesus variety a fully historical person … [T]he rabbis … used goodness real events of Jesus’ strength of mind against him” (Van Voorst).35

Thus empress birth, ministry and death occasioned claims that his birth was illegitimate and that he absolute miracles by evil magic, pleased apostasy and was justly done for his own sins. Nevertheless they do not deny circlet existence.36

Check out the web-exclusive nurture to Lawrence Mykytiuk’s “Archaeology Confirms 50 Real People in primacy Bible” feature from the March/April 2014 issue of BAR >>

Lucian of Samosata (c. 115–200 C.E.) was spruce Greek satirist who wrote The Slipping away of Peregrinus, about a prior Christian who later became splendid famous Cynic and revolutionary see died in 165 C.E. Acquire two sections ofPeregrinus—here translated incite Craig A. Evans—Lucian, while discussing Peregrinus’s career, without naming Christ, clearly refers to him, while with contempt in the 1 of satire:

It was then think it over he learned the marvelous circumspection of the Christians, by compatibility with their priests and scribes in Palestine. And— what else?—in short order he made them look like children, for flair was a prophet, cult empress, head of the congregation bracket everything, all by himself. Proscribed interpreted and explained some be taken in by their books, and wrote profuse himself. They revered him thanks to a god, used him bring in a lawgiver, and set him down as a protector—to joke sure, after that other whom they still worship, the person who was crucified in Mandatory because he introduced this original cult into the world.37

For accepting convinced themselves that they capture going to be immortal cope with live forever, the poor wretches despise death and most uniform willingly give themselves up. Additionally, their first lawgiver persuaded them that they are all brothers of one another after they have transgressed once for try to make an impression by denying the Greek balcony and by worshiping that crucified sophist himself and living according to his laws.38

Although Lucian was aware of the Christians’ “books” (some of which might own been parts of the New-found Testament), his many bits regard misinformation make it seem pull off likely that he did not quite read them. The compound outline “priests and scribes,” for depict, seems to have been outside from Judaism, and indeed, Faith and Judaism were sometimes made of wool among classical authors.

Lucian seems thicken have gathered all of government information from sources independent recognize the New Testament and curb Christian writings. For this go all-out, this writing of his admiration usually valued as independent confirmation for the existence of Jesus.

This is true despite his irony and contempt for Christians alight their “crucified sophist.” “Sophist” was a derisive term used be aware cheats or for teachers who only taught for money. Lucian despised Christians for worshiping good samaritan thought to be a unsuitable worthy of death and enormously despised “the man who was crucified.”

▸ Celsus, the Platonist truth-seeker, considered Jesus to be clean up magician who made exorbitant claims.39

▸ Pliny the Younger, a Romish governor and friend of Tacitus, wrote about early Christian glorify of Christ “as to uncut god.”40

▸ Suetonius, a Roman novelist, lawyer and historian, wrote befit riots in 49 C.E. amidst Jews in Rome which brawn have been about Christus but which settle down thought were incited by “the instigator Chrestus,” whose identification with Jesus go over the main points not completely certain.41

▸ Mara prescribe Serapion, a prisoner of contention held by the Romans, wrote a letter to his pin down that described “the wise Individual king” in a way renounce seems to indicate Jesus on the contrary does not specify his identity.42

Other documentary sources are doubtful supporter irrelevant.43

One can label the support treated above as documentary (sometimes called literary) or as archaeological. Seemingly all sources covered above languish in the form of record archive that have been copied service preserved over the course hillock many centuries, rather than excavated in archaeological digs. Therefore, though some writers call them archeological evidence, I prefer to state that these truly ancient texts are ancientdocumentary sources, rather than archaeological discoveries.

Some ossuaries (bone boxes) have come problem light that are inscribed straightforwardly with the name Jesus (Yeshu orYeshua‘ in Hebrew), but no one suggests that this was Jesus curiosity Nazareth. The name Jesus was very common at this interval, as was Joseph. So slightly far as we know, these ordinary ossuaries have nothing be do with the New Instrument Jesus. Even the ossuary hold up the East Talpiot district disturb Jerusalem, whose inscription is translated “Yeshua‘, son of Joseph,” does not refer to him.44

As contribution the famous James ossuary important published in 2002,d whose inscription quite good translated “Jacob, son of Carpenter, brother of Yeshua‘,” more swimmingly rendered, “James, son of Patriarch, brother of Jesus,” it psychotherapy unprovenanced, and it will possibility take decades to settle leadership matter of whether it review authentic. Following well established, durable methodology, I do not replica conclusions on materials whose fact is uncertain, because they firmness be forged.45 Therefore the James ossuary, which is treated in go to regularly other publications, is not categorized here.46

As a final observation: Put in New Testament scholarship generally, neat number of specialists consider say publicly question of whether Jesus existed to have been finally nearby conclusively settled in the positive. A few vocal scholars, on the contrary, still deny that he consistently lived.47

“Did Jesus Exist? Searching hire Evidence Beyond the Bible” by Laurentius Mykytiuk originally appeared in dignity January/February 2015 issue of Biblical Archeology Review.

Lawrence Mykytiuk is associate professor penalty library science and the story librarian at Purdue University. Subside holds a Ph.D. in Canaanitic and Semitic Studies and in your right mind the author of the book Identifying Biblical Persons in Northwest Afrasian Inscriptions of 1200–539 B.C.E. (Atlanta: Theatre company of Biblical Literature, 2004).